BaalVikas
Menu
Language Acquisition & Language Learning
Asked 3 months ago · Viewed 4,091 times
हिन्दी English

In the context of 'Language Development and Psycholinguistic Theories', regarding the neuro-cognitive nature of the 'Language Acquisition Device' (LAD) and 'Universal Grammar' proposed by Noam Chomsky, the interrelationships of language development views of Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky (such as 'egocentric speech' versus 'social speech and inner speech'), and their implications for modern primary inclusive classroom teaching, multilingual pedagogy, and the enhancement of communication skills in students, which of the following statements is most appropriate and true?

Detailed Explanation & Solution

Explanation

According to Noam Chomsky, children possess an innate capacity to learn language, for which the 'Language Acquisition Device' (LAD) is responsible, and they are born with the rules of universal grammar. In contrast, Lev Vygotsky's socio-cultural theory posits that language develops primarily through social interaction and plays a central role in a child's cognitive development (such as transitioning from 'social speech' to 'inner speech'). Piaget considered 'egocentric speech' to be a symbol of a child's cognitive immaturity. Therefore, option (b) most accurately defines the scientific and interrelated nature of the theories of these three thinkers.

  • Chomsky: Focuses on the innate biological capacity (LAD and Universal Grammar).
  • Vygotsky: Emphasizes social interaction and cultural tools (Social and Inner Speech).
  • Piaget: Viewed egocentric speech as reflecting cognitive immaturity.
Share:
Next question → In the context of the 'interrelationship between language acquisition and… ← Previous question In the context of the 'psychological theories of language…
Log in to add to quiz, bookmark, or report issues.