BaalVikas
Menu
Operant Conditioning (Skinner)
Asked 2 months ago · Viewed 2,619 times
हिन्दी English

When making an in-depth analysis of Thorndike's 'Law of Readiness' under learning theories, Pavlov's 'Stimulus Generalization' in 'Classical Conditioning', and Skinner's concept of 'Shaping' in 'Operant Conditioning', which of the following statements most authentically explains the conceptual and practical differences among these three psychological concepts?

Detailed Explanation & Solution

Detailed Analysis of Learning Theories

To understand the fundamental differences among these core learning theories, let's break down each concept:

  • Thorndike's Law of Readiness: States that when a conduction unit is ready to conduct, for it to do so is satisfying, highlighting neural pathway preparedness.
  • Pavlov's Stimulus Generalization: Occurs when an organism responds to stimuli similar to the conditioned stimulus, producing a similar conditioned response.
  • Skinner's Shaping (Aakritikaran): A method in operant conditioning where complex and novel behaviors are gradually developed through the reinforcement of successive approximations.

Therefore, option A accurately captures the distinct theoretical essence and practical application of all three concepts.

Share:
Next question → Comparing the essential and functional aspects of Thorndike's 'Trial and Error… ← Previous question Upon a rigorous analysis of the historical and theoretical…
Log in to add to quiz, bookmark, or report issues.