BaalVikas
Menu
Thorndike: Trial and Error
Asked 2 months ago · Viewed 3,193 times
हिन्दी English

Under Edward Thorndike's 'Connectionism or Trial and Error Theory of Learning', a central concept is the 'Law of Effect', which states that responses followed by satisfying or positive outcomes strengthen the stimulus-response bond, while those followed by annoying or punitive outcomes weaken it. Regarding its psychological implications and scientific application in classroom teaching for student reinforcement and permanent learning, which of the following statements is most authentic and scientifically valid?

Detailed Explanation & Solution

Explanation of the Law of Effect

Edward Thorndike's Law of Effect is a cornerstone of learning theory in Child Development and Pedagogy. It posits that satisfying consequences (positive reinforcement) strengthen the Stimulus-Response (S-R) bond.

  • Classroom Implication: When students receive positive appreciation and satisfying outcomes for correct responses, their confidence grows, leading to permanent and meaningful learning experiences.
  • Analysis of Options: Option (b) accurately reflects this scientific premise, whereas options (a), (c), and (d) misrepresent the psychological and pedagogical application of Thorndike's theory.
Share:
Next question → Under Edward Thorndike's Trial and Error Theory of Learning, a central concept… ← Previous question Upon a deep analysis of the philosophical and comparative…
Log in to add to quiz, bookmark, or report issues.