Operant Conditioning (Skinner)
Asked 2 months ago · Viewed 2,657 times
On a micro-analysis of the foundational, functional, and structural bases of the 'Trial and Error Theory' propounded by Edward Thorndike and the 'Operant Conditioning Theory' propounded by B.F. Skinner in the psychology of learning, which of the following statements is most authentic regarding the fundamental differences between these two theories?
✓ Correct! Well done.
✗ Not quite — the correct answer is highlighted above.
Detailed Explanation & Solution
In Thorndike's Trial and Error theory, the Stimulus occurs first and upon getting satisfying results after the Response, the S-R bond is strengthened, which is called Thorndike's Law of Effect. In contrast, in Skinner's operant conditioning, the organism responds freely of its own accord and subsequently receives a stimulus or reinforcement, hence it is also called R-S type conditioning.
Next question →
Based on a philosophical and comparative analysis of Edward Thorndike's…
← Previous question
Upon a meticulous analysis of the philosophical…
Related Questions
→
Under the psychology of learning, while closely analyzing Edward Thorndike's 'Primary Laws of Learning' and…
→
When conducting an in-depth psychological analysis of the role of 'reinforcement' and the nature of…
→
Upon a deep analysis of the philosophical and functional nature of Thorndike's 'Connectionism', Pavlov's…
→
Upon a thorough philosophical and comparative analysis of Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory' and…
→
Under the psychology of learning, a detailed analysis of the philosophical, comparative, and experimental…
→
When conducting a comparative philosophical analysis of Edward Thorndike's Connectionism, Ivan Pavlov's…
→
Upon a meticulous analysis of the foundational and comparative dynamics of Thorndike's Trial and Error…
→
When micro-analyzing the philosophical and neurobiological dynamics of Edward Thorndike's 'Law of…
Log in
to add to quiz, bookmark, or report issues.