Operant Conditioning (Skinner)
Asked 2 months ago · Viewed 2,173 times
In the comparative analysis of Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory', Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning Theory', and Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning Theory' under the psychology of learning, which of the following options most accurately explains the essential difference in the 'Stimulus-Response' (S-R) and 'Response-Stimulus' (R-S) paradigms among these three theories?
✓ Correct! Well done.
✗ Not quite — the correct answer is highlighted above.
Detailed Explanation & Solution
In learning theories, Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory' and Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning Theory' give priority to the stimulus, where the S-R relationship is important. In contrast, B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' emphasizes that the organism first makes a response and the reinforcement received as a result determines the behavior, which is termed the R-S paradigm.
Next question →
While conducting a comparative study among traditional theories of…
← Previous question
While conducting a comparative analysis of Edward…
Related Questions
→
Under the psychology of learning, while closely analyzing Edward Thorndike's 'Primary Laws of Learning' and…
→
When conducting an in-depth psychological analysis of the role of 'reinforcement' and the nature of…
→
Upon a deep analysis of the philosophical and functional nature of Thorndike's 'Connectionism', Pavlov's…
→
Upon a thorough philosophical and comparative analysis of Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory' and…
→
During a meticulous analysis of the classical learning theories—specifically examining the intrinsic…
→
Under B.F. Skinner's Operant Conditioning Theory, while analyzing various types of reinforcement and…
→
In the context of the comparative study of Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory', Ivan Pavlov's…
Log in
to add to quiz, bookmark, or report issues.