Operant Conditioning (Skinner)
Asked 3 months ago · Viewed 4,447 times
In the context of the philosophical and comparative study of Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory' and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning', which of the following statements most accurately explains the fundamental and scientific difference between these two theories?
✓ Correct! Well done.
✗ Not quite — the correct answer is highlighted above.
Detailed Explanation & Solution
In Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory', the stimulus is present beforehand and the organism attempts to reach or respond to it (S-R Theory). Conversely, in Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning', the organism emits a response independently, and the subsequent consequence or reinforcement determines the likelihood of that behavior recurring (R-S Theory).
Next question →
While conducting a micro-analysis of the interrelationships and philosophical…
← Previous question
While micro-analyzing the theoretical, experimental, and…
Related Questions
→
Under the psychology of learning, while closely analyzing Edward Thorndike's 'Primary Laws of Learning' and…
→
When conducting an in-depth psychological analysis of the role of 'reinforcement' and the nature of…
→
Upon a deep analysis of the philosophical and functional nature of Thorndike's 'Connectionism', Pavlov's…
→
Upon a thorough philosophical and comparative analysis of Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory' and…
→
Which of the following is the most fundamental and philosophical difference between Thorndike's Trial and…
→
In the context of the comparative study of Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory', Ivan Pavlov's…
→
While conducting a detailed micro-analysis of the philosophical and functional nature of the 'Trial and…
→
While micro-analyzing the substantial and experimental nature of the 'Trial and Error Theory' propounded by…
Log in
to add to quiz, bookmark, or report issues.