Operant Conditioning (Skinner)
Asked 3 months ago · Viewed 2,636 times
Under the psychology of learning, regarding the nature of stimulus-response (S-R) relationships and control mechanisms among Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning', B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning', and Edward Thorndike's 'Connectionism', which of the following analytical statements is most appropriate?
✓ Correct! Well done.
✗ Not quite — the correct answer is highlighted above.
Detailed Explanation & Solution
In Ivan Pavlov's classical conditioning, the stimulus precedes the response and the response is involuntary or respondent. In contrast, in B.F. Skinner's operant conditioning, the organism is active, the response is voluntary (operant), and it is controlled by its consequences (reinforcement/punishment). Thorndike emphasized the strengthening of S-R bonds through trial and error, where the law of effect plays a major role.
Next question →
In the context of learning theories, when conducting a deep analysis of the…
← Previous question
Among the primary laws of learning propounded by Edward…
Related Questions
→
Under the psychology of learning, while closely analyzing Edward Thorndike's 'Primary Laws of Learning' and…
→
When conducting an in-depth psychological analysis of the role of 'reinforcement' and the nature of…
→
Upon a deep analysis of the philosophical and functional nature of Thorndike's 'Connectionism', Pavlov's…
→
In the context of the comparative and psychological analysis of Thorndike's 'Law of Readiness', Pavlov's…
→
Deeply analyzing the foundational and functional differences between Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error…
→
Conducting an in-depth analysis of the underlying functional and theoretical differences between Ivan…
→
In the psychology of learning, regarding the relationship between Stimulus (S) and Response (R) among…
→
In B.F. Skinner's theory of Operant Conditioning, the Schedules of Reinforcement hold special significance.…
Log in
to add to quiz, bookmark, or report issues.