BaalVikas
Menu
Thorndike: Trial and Error
Asked 3 months ago · Viewed 1,578 times
हिन्दी English

Under Edward Thorndike's Connectionism or Trial and Error Theory, the 'Law of Readiness' posits that when a nervous system is fully prepared to act, doing so is satisfying, and when it is not prepared and forced to act, it is annoying. Regarding its psychological implications and scientific management of students' mental preparation, motivation levels, and learning effectiveness in classroom teaching, which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid?

Detailed Explanation & Solution

Explanation of Thorndike's Law of Readiness

Edward Thorndike's Law of Readiness, a core component of his Trial and Error Theory, emphasizes that learning is most effective and satisfying when the learner's nervous system and mental structure are fully prepared to perform the action.

  • Internal Readiness: It highlights that mental and physical preparedness directs focused effort.
  • Classroom Implications: Forcing instruction when a student is mentally unprepared leads to frustration and dissatisfaction.
  • Motivation and Quality: Proper mental readiness significantly enhances both the pace and the quality of learning.

Therefore, option (b) is the most accurate and scientifically valid psychological interpretation of this law in educational settings.

Share:
Next question → According to Edward Thorndike's 'Connectionism and Trial & Error Theory', the… ← Previous question Under Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory', the…
Log in to add to quiz, bookmark, or report issues.